Angelina Jolie in Atelier VersaceBradgelina hit the
Inspired by its color and draped bust, this tea rose Zac Posen dress is perfect for a classy cocktail hour. We love the showy knee-length hem because it eliminates the need for a slit. Pair with satiny pumps for the perfect Angelina goes to
The floor-length hem and draping bust-to-shoulder construction of this Thakoon dress creates an Angelina goes to Cannes inspired outfit in white. Pair with painted red lips for a perfect summer cocktail party look.
We love this flowy Roksanda Ilincic dress. The soft color and draped satin construction recreates the femininity of Angelina’s gown. Pair with a matching clutch for your Angelina goes to Cannes inspired look.Purchase all of these inspiring dresses at NET-A-PORTER.COM
Posts
2 comments:
I happen to Love the Zac Posen dress, it's so elegant!
http://www.redpoppyfashion.blogspot.com
If Brad and Angie's 'charity' and 'humanitarian' work is legit, then why don't they donate directly to the most efficient charities to begin with? Why must the funds be donated to their own foundation first? Why are the donations to and from the Jolie-Pitt Foundation publicized so often within a week of their latest film or DVD release? Why isn't their foundation rated by any independent charity watchdog? Why havn't they spent or granted the majority of their funding so far directly on 'humanitarian' work? Why are the private jets and super high-end accomodations around the world necessary to promote 'good will'? Why would Brad Pitt compete for funding, awareness, and support with the most efficient home building charity organization in the world (Habitat For Humanity)? Why not just endorse and support Habitat instead?
Why in the name of all that is right and logical would a 'humanitarian' squander such obscene levels of limited life sustaining resources on multiple mansions, private jet rides, private helicopter rides, and super exclusive super high-end accomodations around the world? Why in the name of all that is right and logical would a 'humanitarian' deliberately concentrate the world's wealth and resources? Why would they DELIBERATELY expand the gap between the rich and poor? Why would they promote, accept, and celebrate the concept of extreme wealth or obscene compensation for the making of movies? Even now when so many people worldwide struggle to survive? Why not call for a more reasonable, moral, and logical pay-scale for all people? Why not call for a more reasonable distribution of wealth? WHY ARE HOLLYWOOD HUMANITARIANS SUCH DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOBS?
Post a Comment